“Great negotiators are able to question the assumptions that the rest of the involved players accept on faith or in arrogance, and thus remain more emotionally open to all possibilities, and more intellectually agile to a fluid situation.” - Chris Voss
The remote work debate has recently taken center stage, and it's more complex than ever. As companies, CEOs, VCs, and people on social media weigh in, the question remains: Should you return to the office or not?
One camp argues that employees should head back to the office, while the other stands firm on the choice to work remotely. Both sides present their reasons, but let's delve deeper into this intriguing matter.
The crux of the debate revolves around conclusions. On one side, there's a conclusion that returning to the office is the way forward. On the other side, the conclusion is quite the opposite.
But let's consider this: if the aim is to merely win the argument, the challenge of solving the real problem is easily overshadowed. Why?
Because both perspectives hold merit. The arguments on both sides are grounded in assumptions or premises that lead to their respective conclusions.
These assumptions can sway either way: correct or incorrect. Yet, when our focus is solely on proving our own argument's truth and logical coherence, we miss the opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue that could lead to problem-solving.
Let's explore some of these assumptions:
For remote work: Flexibility enhances productivity, reduces commuting stress, cuts costs, and promotes work-life balance.
For returning to the office: Concerns about security, accountability, collapsing work-life boundaries, jeopardizing company culture, and a lack of collaboration.
So, what's the real issue at hand? Let's boil it down to a question:
How can organizations and employees effectively balance the desire for flexible remote work arrangements with the need for productive collaboration, employee well-being, company culture, and operational efficiency in an ever-evolving work landscape?
Simplified even further:
How do we find the right balance between remote work and office collaboration for enhanced productivity, employee well-being, and a thriving company culture?
Ultimately, do we want to win a debate, or do we want to solve a problem?
If our true intent is to solve the problem, we must invest more effort in introspection, questioning (our) assumptions, and adopting an empathetic stance by listening attentively to and understanding (while not necessarily agreeing with) opposing viewpoints.
Do I have all the answers? No.
Yet, by clarifying the problem and grasping the assumptions underlying each perspective, we can foster an environment that promotes effective idea exchange.
This debate's intrigue lies in its spotlight on the need for control. Employees seek control over their choices and work environment, while employers aim to maintain control over organizational processes and employee monitoring.
The tide of change has disrupted both sides' views. However, a debate fixated on victory over problem-solving is a path leading nowhere.
A philosophical mindset would help address these issues offering a fresh perspective.
That's precisely what the "Philosophy for Professionals" workshop, which I've developed and conducted twice (in June & July with 18 participants in total), aims to achieve.
Over the span of three sessions in a week (totaling 4.5 hours), we delve into:
Asking more meaningful questions and challenging assumptions to reframe problems, using the Socratic framework.
Navigating uncertainty by focusing on what lies within our control, following Stoic principles and frameworks.
Unraveling the ethical frameworks we utilize when facing dilemmas to enhance our approach, foster mutual understanding, and improve conflict resolution.
Mark your calendars: The third cohort begins on September 5th, followed by sessions on September 7th and 12th, all at 7 pm CET. Enrolled participants will receive recordings of all sessions. 10 spots are available. Price: $250 USD.
1-on-1 quest: In addition, you can book a 30-minute 1-on-1 call at no additional cost where we can discuss the workshop, and any questions you might have, or simply explore specific topics of interest for you.
"The journey towards improved decision-making starts with questioning one's own beliefs, biases, and assumptions. This practice is often neglected and certainly not easy to undertake." - Warren Berger
So, are you ready to embark on a philosophical quest that goes beyond abstract concepts?
Your journey starts here. Sign up at the following link!
https://philosophyforprofessionals.com